Sorry it’s taken so much time to clean it up, but here it is.
More tonight!
Ken
Here is the situation. The Last Discourse presents us with the Beloved Disciple’s account of Jesus’ last evening with his disciples. John continues putting before the reader the overwhelming sadness in the room, Jesus’ constant references to returning to his Father, and this new information that once he returned to his Father, he would send the Paraclete. “Your hearts are full of sadness.” They hardly understood anything Jesus was saying and it would be sometime down the road before the Paraclete, the Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit would give them insight into what Jesus calls “the way of all truth.”
For a moment let us examine the meaning of the word “Comforter.” The Greek word in the text is Paraclete. Literally it means “one called alongside to help” and so we get English translations like Advocate and Comforter. The identity of the Comforter is the Holy Spirit. If we look at how the Paraclete functions in this passage this is what we get: Beginning sometime soon after the events described in the Farwell Discourse, He will essentially stand in for Jesus till the General Resurrection. He will bring back to the Apostles’ memory the words of Jesus and he will give them insight into their meaning. He will enable the apostolic eyewitnesses to function as Apostles. But it appears that the overarching work of the Paraclete will be to act as the defense witness for Jesus in the context of his trail before his enemies. Furthermore it is as though Jesus’ trial before the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem and Pilate (which from their point-of-view is only hours away) will not be over when Pilate delivers his verdict, but when God delivers his final verdict.
Furthermore, our participation in Christ is to be so through going – note his prayer in John 17 “I am not praying for the world but for those whom thou hast given me, for they are thine; all mine are thine, and thine are mine, and I am glorified in them… “ And again, “For their sake I consecrate myself, that they also may be consecrated in truth.” Our identity is so radically altered by our participation in Christ that his trial is our trial and our trial before the world is his trial. It is as though we stand accused alongside Jesus and he stands accused alongside us in the world so that the allegations brought against us in this world are tantamount to re-trying Jesus. But we have nothing to fear. Because the Holy Spirit will defend us just as Jesus had said: “When they haul you into court do not worry about defending yourself for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that same hour what to say.” It is not enough that the Holy Spirit will act as our Advocate; He will also turn the tables and prosecute those who brought charges against Jesus and those who presumed to judge his disciples. In his defense of Jesus and in his defense of Jesus’ disciples, the Holy Spirit will shine a light on this world’s bankruptcy of truth and legitimacy.
So first, the Accuser of the World, the Holy Spirit
The Paraclete will show the disciples that the enemies of Jesus are all guilty of the sin of deliberate disbelief in Jesus. Our Lord himself said,
“The Light has come into the world, but men have preferred darkness to light because their deeds were evil.”
These evil deeds are specifically the refusal to believe in Jesus and the collateral damage that entails that disbelief. That sin reaches its sickening conclusion in the Cross. But further the Paraclete will show that the sin of unbelief is not limited to that historic circle of evil men who put Jesus on trial. No! That very sin of unbelief is the sin of the world today. We may think that is a bit harsh. After all we may reason, “Just because a person does not believe in Jesus doesn’t mean they are hostile toward him.” If they are not hostile it is because they think it silly to believe in such nonsense or they do not know the historic Jesus.
The Paraclete reveals that the world’s sense of justice is in fact immoral because Jesus is innocent of the charges laid against him. Before and during his trial he was accused of blasphemy for claiming to be equal with God. “I and my Father are one.” He was guilty not only of astonishing arrogance, but he was a sinner, a deceiver and blasphemer according to his enemies. They were sure he was not God’s son and sentenced him to death. But in fact, he tells his disciples repeatedly that he is returning to his Father. The Paraclete will come to the disciples only after he has returned to this Father. And that is what happened. On Pentecost Peter and the other Apostles took it to the street in Jerusalem and proclaimed Jesus’ as the Saviour of the World. Only a few months later St. Stephen himself, full of the Holy Spirit, as he was about to be stoned to death in Jerusalem, bore witness to Jesus’ innocence and victory:
“I see the glory of God, and Jesus standing right next to his Father.”
Finally the Paraclete will prove that in judging Jesus guilty and not believing in him, the world’s judgment has recoiled upon itself.
His enemies thought they had victory. But in the Cross Jesus confronted the prince of this world and Jesus now stands justified before his Father. In his Resurrection he has conquered death and hell and it is the world that is found guilty.
Now with all three of these actions, the Paraclete infuses courage into the disciples in those critical early days after our Lord’s Resurrection and Ascension and especially after the persecutions began. But I want to underline this: the courage, the resilience, the strength Jesus promised in the Paraclete was meant for the whole Church in time and space and not just the disciples who were with him that evening.
Imagine what it was like for these little parishes scattered all over the world when the last of the apostolic eyewitnesses died. The Apostle was a living cord joining the Church to Jesus of Nazareth. As long as they were present these apostolic eyewitnesses could interpret the meaning of the gospel narrative, the meaning of Jesus’ very word and deed for every situation the Church faced. For example, these apostolic eyewitnesses would have to interpret the meaning of the persecution of the Church after the deaths of James and Stephen. They gave voice to what Jesus would have said about the existential realities and exigencies they were facing, many of which were horrible.
Imaginatively place yourself in one of these tiny parishes that had grown up around the apostolic eyewitnesses. What do you think would happen when these eyewitnesses began to die? James died in Jerusalem in 62 AD. Stephen too. Paul was beheaded in Rome around 66 – 67 AD. Around the same time St. Peter was crucified. It is the universal testimony of the Church that last Apostle to die was the Beloved Disciple, John. He was a very old man and he died around the year 100 AD. Now that is amazing since that date is within a handful of years backward or forward for the ministry of St. Polycarp who had spent a good deal of time with John. That would also be contemporaneous with the life of St. Ignatius of Antioch, whose letters we have.
Now when the Beloved Disciple finally died I imagine it was a major crisis for his churches, not unlike what he and the other disciples had experienced when Jesus informed them that he was returning to his Father. As long as Jesus was with them they were safe. In the same way, as long as John was alive he was a sure interpreter of everything Jesus said and did. John’s own disciples – the deacons, priests and bishops he had ordained could return to him time and again to asked questions and obtain his directions. They could hang out with him like Polycarp did. John had been a companion of Jesus. When John laid his hands upon you, you knew that those very hands had touched and had been touched by the hands of Jesus Christ.
What got these little parishes through the crisis of the death of the Beloved Disciple? I will tell you what got them through. It was that document he had written and re-written, and rewritten which final form we know as the Gospel of John. And in particular the Farwell Discourse. Yes, these apostolic eyewitnesses were the Pillars of the Church, living links between Jesus of Nazareth and the baptized. But it was not merely their own memories or even their own personal experiences that made them the trustworthy interpreters of all that Jesus did or said. No, it was not merely their personal experiences, it was the gift of the Holy Spirit that not only quickened their memories of the words of Jesus, but also gave them, as it were, Jesus’ own interpretation of his words and deeds – that made them reliable. The Church at first probably placed her confidence in the personal experiences of the Apostles, but in time Holy Mother Church came to place all her confidence the gift of the Holy Spirit. She came to understand that the Paraclete guided the eyewitnesses, like the Beloved Disciple, and he would continue to guide the Church and her members after the death of the Beloved Disciple. The Paraclete indwells Church and all her members. And because of that, those men and women who buried the Beloved Apostle and Ignatius and Polycarp, and those of us here today who believe in Jesus and kneel to receive his Body and Blood are as close to Jesus as were the apostolic eyewitnesses themselves. That is what the Church believes.
MASS SCHEDULE FOR THE WEEK OF EASTER IV (May 6, 2012)
7, Monday – Feria
8, Tuesday – Feria
9, Wednesday – Gregory of Nazianzus
10, Thursday – Feria
11, Friday – Feria
+ Ken Myers will be teaching this Wednesday class this week on Music in the worship, doctrine and life of the Church. Dinner is served at 5:45 PM and classes for all age groups begin at 6:30 PM.
+ Don’t forget that next Wednesday, May 16, is our Last Wednesday School Agape and Class time till Michaelmas! I will be cooking (for at least 10 hours) authentic, North Carolina vinegar based barbeque -something that Virginians have failed to accomplish since the settling of the New World. Bring a friend, a Virginian if possible, and know that God will deem it a work of supererogation.
+ All Saints’ Men’s Group will meet May 8, 7:00 a.m. in the undercroft.
+ Daily Mass at 12:15 p.m. Please take an All Saints parish prayer list home with you & remember your fellow parishioners in your prayers!
+ It’s not for women only! Weekday Bible study of the Gospel of John meets Mondays at 10:30 a.m. If you have questions, please email Priscilla at kingplk@gmail.com or call her at 540-456-6458.
+ Gregory of Nazianzus (Bishop, Confessor & Doctor, c.329 – c.389) was the Bishop of Nazianzus and is numbered amongst the Cappadocian Fathers, along with Basil the Great and Gregory of Nyssa.
The son of a bishop suffragan, Gregory was educated at the highly esteemed University of Athens, which would later aid him in defending the Nicene proclamation of Christ’s divinity against Arianism. He subsequently gave up his solitary life as a monk and was ordained priest and later bishop. Gregory is best known for the role he played in shaping the conclusions of the Nicene Creed during the Council of Constantinople in 381. His deep knowledge and love of scripture allowed him to convey through poetic language the ineffable love that exists between the Father, Son and Holy Ghost.Called “the Theologian,” Gregory was given to the Church to teach the faith and guide God’s people in the way of everlasting salvation. (the day’s collect page F 26, People’s Anglican Missal). Pray that God continues to give us learned and holy teachers, so that we do not lose our way in this generation.
If we are blessed to avoid sudden death, one day we shall yet all lay a-dying. Over the years I have been with many of my parishioners in their last days and last hours of this mortal life and I have never had one request that I read from the works of Aristotle or Socrates or the Constitution. But I have frequently read from the Bible, the Psalter and the Book of Common Prayer and I have habitually recited passages from the Fourth Gospel – all to their comfort, the comfort of their loved ones and my own comfort. Today we open up one of those sections of Scripture that has brought comfort to the dying, the dispossessed and the bereaved. From today till Trinity all the Gospels are taken from what is call The Farewell Discourse. It begins in the 13th Chapter of John, verse 31:
The 18th Chapter of John, verse 1 marks the end of The Last Discourse:
These are well known scriptures – some meant to comfort the disciples, some meant to instruct, and the whole of Chapter 17 is Jesus’ prayer to the Father which both comforts and instructs. So remember this setting: Our Lord had celebrated his last Passover with his disciples, he has instituted the Holy Communion, Judas has left the well-lit room and entered the dark night deliberately to betray Jesus. At the beginning of the evening the disciples were happy because they were celebrating Passover with Jesus; but as soon as Judas left, Jesus’ tone changed. The disciples became confused and a deep pall of sadness fell over the room.
The disciples responded like any of us would have: “What is he saying to us, A little while and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me…”
Our first impulse is probably to understand it this way: Soon Jesus will die and so they will not see him. But in a little while they will see him because he will rise from the dead. This is certainly true. This is exactly the experience that was upon them at that very moment. But I want to suggest that the Church has, rightly, taken these troubling words of our Lord as words of comfort that go beyond the immediate experience of the disciples.
The disciples could not possibly understand what Jesus was talking about. It would have been futile for him to go to greater lengths to explain what he meant. They had no categories nor did they have any real life experiences to help them make sense of what Jesus was saying. But after his Resurrection and his Ascension and the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, the meaning lit up for the Church. These words point to our common destiny. Yes, these words do refer to his death and resurrection; and later on this promise brought consolation, reassurance and cheer to the Church. So this enigmatic saying is a reference to his death and resurrection, it is also a reference to the descent of the Holy Spirit and it also refers to the Last Day, the Last Hour, and the Second Coming of our Lord. Those disciples gathered around him in the Upper Room did see him after his Resurrection. With the gift of the Holy Spirit we do “see” Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar. But there is another “seeing” that is yet to be.
Before I go any further let me say something about the word “comfort.” The word “comfort” as it is used in the Book of Common Prayer and in the older translation of the Scriptures is, ironically, obsolete today. Today we shorten the word comfort to comfy. It commonly means ease or warmth, or to console or to cheer up. But when used in the BCP or the Bible it means to “instill courage” or “to bind with strength.” The Comfortable Words in the Mass are meant to make you stronger. The words of Christ in the Farewell Discourse over the years has given folk fortitude; in our hour of darkness these words are meant fortify us, to build us up.
But sorrow has not vanished from the human family. It has not vanished from my family or your family. Sorrow has not vanished from the life of the Church. No, our sorrow is not the hopeless, nihilistic grief of the world. But we still experience profound trouble and bereavement. And yet, Jesus has promised us a joy that will overwhelm any malignant power that comes against us. This is a future joy. It is our common destiny.
Even in light of “seeing him” at his Resurrection, even in light of “seeing him” in the descent of the Holy Spirit and the gift of the Church and the Sacraments, there is an even greater “seeing” that will come. It will be the permanent and final presence of Christ. And as needful, glorious and wonderful as the Holy Communion is for us now, in that great “seeing,” when we behold the man, nothing will match his splendor! On that day he will wipe the tears from your eyes and you will know a joy that you cannot possibly understand today. This puts you in the very position of those disciples gathered around his Passover table on the night he was betrayed. This is a joy that surpasses our understanding. But it will be fully realized at our Lord’s Second Coming.
This is what is sometimes referred to as the Messianic Travail. The solemnity, the heaviness in the room at that moment is appropriate. Though they hardly understood all he said, the tone of sorrow, trouble, and distress is fully understandable.
The image of the woman in birth pangs is a reference to the free-will suffering of the Good Shepherd for the life of the world – and more. The hour of Jesus’ glory was the Cross. The hour of the woman is the time of her delivery. The birth of a child brought a woman close to death. Childbearing in antiquity “did not have the benefits of modern means to reduce pain, and a mother’s pain became proverbial for great travail.” The woman’s hour, her birth pangs in the Old Testament and the New Testament came to be associated with the last hour of this world as the new world order of God’s kingdom would be realized in the God’s victory. It is Christ’s revelation that God’s victory is final with Jesus Cross and his victory will be visible with his resurrection and his second advent. Jesus’ choice of the woman in childbirth is intentional.
And don’t forget the first day of his resurrection. The risen Christ opened up Old Testament for the Emmaus disciples on the first day of his resurrection when he said:
It is the parable of the woman in childbirth that would lead the disciples back to Genesis 3:14-16 where God declared that the woman will suffer birth pangs in childbearing, but he also promises that the woman will bring forth a child who would crush the head of the serpent, though the serpent bruise his heel.
Again in Isaiah 26:17:
The woman in childbirth points to the suffering Messiah, the victory of Christ over death and sin and the new order that God will bring upon the world with the second advent.
Later on St. John the Divine would see terrible things and record them in the Revelation:
The child here is sometimes interpreted to be Jesus, and sometimes interpreted to be children of God. The woman is sometimes understood as the Blessed Virgin Mary and sometimes understood as Holy Mother Church. In any case the red dragon is destroyed and the Woman and Child are saved. So as you can see, our Lord’s use of image of the woman in childbirth is not merely an accurate image, it is loaded up from Genesis to Revelation with the suffering of the Messiah and the victory of God. And something else as well, just as the woman in childbirth gives birth as she enters her travail, so our Lord Jesus Christ, as he enters his travail upon the Cross gives birth to the people of God. Jesus’ disciples may be “born from above” because of the birth pangs of the Cross. And just as birth pangs are temporary and finally issue in a longer lasting joy; so we, the children of God, receive a joy that no one can take from us.